Make
FYAI Score
8.6 / 10
Based on 332 reviews
Pricing:
Best for:
Score Breakdown
- Ease of use8.7 / 10
- Features8.6 / 10
- Pricing9.3 / 10
- Integrations8.7 / 10
- Support7.6 / 10
PRODUCT PREVIEW
What this AI tool does
Use cases
Best for
Workflow Automation
Marketing Automation
CRM Automation
ANALYSIS
Strengths & limitations
Strengths |
-
Best suited to operations and department teams because the visual builder lets non-engineers design and maintain workflows across business apps. -
Strong fit for AI workflow orchestration because teams can connect AI models and agents to repeatable processes rather than using AI in isolated prompts. -
Useful for organizations with varied tooling because its large integration library reduces the need to build and maintain custom connectors.
Limitations |
-
Less suitable for teams that only need simple single-app automation because Make’s scenario-based workflow design can be more structure than the use case requires. -
Freemium pricing can become a constraint for high-volume automation because meaningful usage and scaling typically depend on paid capacity. -
Less suitable for highly custom, latency-sensitive, or deeply embedded backend systems because a visual orchestration platform is not a full replacement for bespoke engineering.
Evaluation
FYAI score breakdown
Our structured evaluation across five key criteria
8.6 / 10
Overall score
Based on 332 reviews
- Ease of use8.7 / 10
- Features8.6 / 10
- Pricing9.3 / 10
- Integrations8.7 / 10
- Support7.6 / 10
What users say
Findings from public reviews, documentation and community sources.
- Ease of use
G2 lists Make at 4.6/5 across 332 reviews, and the G2 review excerpt says Make’s “visual, no-code approach” makes “complex, multi-step workflows” feel “genuinely accessible even without a development” background. Complex scenario building implies more learning than the simplest trigger-action tools.
- Features
The G2 excerpt highlights Make’s ability to create “complex, multi-step workflows” through a visual no-code interface. Make’s homepage describes Make as a platform to “visually build, scale and automate AI and agentic workflows.”
- Pricing
Make’s pricing page lists a free tier at “$0/mo” with “Up to 1,000 credits/mo.” Make’s pricing page lists paid tiers starting at “$12/mo” for “10k credits/mo.”
- Integrations
Make’s integrations page states “Explore over 3000 apps.”
- Support
Reddit’s r/Make is described as the “Make.com community” and “the place to dive into automation, innovation, and creativity.”
Who is this for?
Best for teams building complex, multi-step workflows, the G2 excerpt says Make’s visual, no-code approach makes those workflows accessible even without a development background. Less suited to users who want the simplest trigger-action setup, complex scenario building implies more learning than the simplest trigger-action tools.
PRODUCT PREVIEW
Feature highlights
Visual workflow builder
3,000+ integrations
Enterprise governance
COMPARE
Discover curated alternatives worth comparing
Compare similar AI tools based on features, pricing and use cases
9.0/ 10Based on 3,056 reviews |
Zapier
Best for: | Operations teams |
Pricing | Freemium |
8.6/ 10Based on 779 reviews |
Workato
Best for: | IT & Security teams |
Pricing | Free trial |
8.9/ 10Based on 7,771 reviews |
Uipath
Best for: | Operations teams |
Pricing | Freemium |
Join teams using Make to eliminate busywork and keep work moving automatically. Build smarter workflows in minutes and get time back for what matters.
FAQ
Frequently asked
questions
questions
Everything you need to know about this AI tool,
its features, pricing, use cases, and limitations.
